Vouchers are wrong for Idaho
The idea of education vouchers has been around for decades. These schemes are sometimes called Education Savings Accounts or tax credits. In a nutshell, voucher schemes give taxpayer dollars to parents to spend at the school of their choice. This may sound good on the surface, but in practice voucher schemes introduce a lot of problems into a state's education system. Here are five reasons why vouchers are wrong for Idaho.
Reason #1 - Our public schools will be defunded
Reason #2 - Most parents won't have more choice
Reason #3 - Money will leave our communities
Reason #4 - We won't know what we are paying for
Reason #5 - Our schools will become segregated
The Highland High School gym was ravaged by a fire. Pocatello Fire Department, obtained by ProPublica and Idaho Statesman.
https://www.propublica.org/article/idaho-students-educators-show-us-effects-of-underfunded-schools
Reason #1
Our public schools will be defunded
Idaho's public schools are already the worst-funded schools in the nation. Idaho has the lowest per-student expenditures in the nation again this year coming in at $6682 less per student than the national average.
​​
Meanwhile, the State of Idaho boasted record surpluses in 2021 (~$900 million) and in 2022 (~$2 billion). Instead of using this money to increase education funding, to help fast-growing districts build new schools, or help schools with outdated and crumbling buildings they cut taxes (mostly helping big businesses) costing the state about $600 million per year.
​
Voucher programs would further defund public schools by incentivizing parents to pull their students out of public schools. Different voucher bills do this in different ways. The most extreme of the recent voucher bills proposed in the Idaho legislature, 2023s SB1038, would have given parents $6000/student for educational expenses if they pulled their kids out of public school. Parents could then use this money for pretty much anything they wanted - for example, "tutoring or teaching services provided by an individual or facility". No qualifications or limitations on who could be considered a "tutor" were included in the bill, among other problems. (This bill passed in committee, and then failed on the Senate floor.)
​​
Idaho's public school funding is based on attendance. So, when students leave a public school district, the funding for the district is reduced. ​
​
Public school districts have fixed costs that don't change when some students leave. As the graphic on the left illustrates, fewer students doesn't result in big savings for a school district. Fixed costs include funding for the principal, utilities, teachers, school nurse, counselor, custodian, librarian, facilities, and transportation.
​​​​
Removing students from public schools diverts funding from public school districts that are already severely underfunded to private, religious and/or for-profit schools.​​​